1. I re-read your sentence and you're absolutely right.

2. If we wish to survive as a species, we need to make less babies. Economically forcing people to eat factory-made synthetic foods only buys time.

3. I rejected your point about African/"savage" slavery, not turkeys. ;)

4. If we drew down the human population to a reasonable figure, and returned animals to wild land, we could eat meat sustainably forever.

I respect your views and even applaud them, but you seem to be missing the entire point of the article-- it's not to make a judgement about the morality/immorality of eating meat or anything else, but to question the financial motives behind the coercive transition.

My concern is always about corporate corruption. And I see lots of it here.