Both, as in... reparations re: slavery, and reparations re: Heineken.

You seem to believe that every article should cover all injustices, which is a very strange way to approach individual issues. It's also very unfocused, poor thinking.

Earlier this year, I wrote an article about one particular crime at Chevron. Should I have covered every crime at Chevon, plus every crime at every other oil company in history? No. Because that wasn't the point.

In response to my article about a particular crime at Heineken, you've written in bold and used all caps (which = shouting on the Internet) that I should cover all the other countries founded on slavery. This is, in a word, stupid.